Well, Peter Jackson's latest installment in the Hobbit trilogy is out, and it picks up
right where the last movie left off (so re-watch it if you want, couldn't hurt
before jumping into this one). Bilbo
Baggins and Thorin Oakenshield's group continue their quest to the Lonely
Mountain to reclaim the lost Dwarven kingdom.
However, the story soon becomes more complex. There is a darkness creeping across the land,
and while Smaug the Terrible is a source of darkness sitting on a trove of gold
and jewels, this is something even more terrible than one dragon. What is this threat, and will the group still
be able to succeed in their quest? Well if you read the book, then you already
know, and just want to know if this is a solid adaptation, so let's dive right
into it.
|
Thorin's quest continues, but even as the dangers outside the group grow, you start to see a danger rise from within. |
The story is more of what we saw in the last film. The core material is taken right from
Tolkiens The Hobbit, and it also adds
more material outside of the original work.
This time, however, Legolas makes an appearance. This is something we already saw in the
previews, but he really plays a significant role beyond a simple cameo
appearance. While he is a character I
could hardly dislike from The Lord of the
Rings, he really is a different type of character this time around. Part of the reason is that he is part of the
Wood Elves, who are less civil than the elves we have come to know. But this really is a different Legolas: less
aloof and more jealousy. While there are
some other, more clever references to Lord
of the Rings, Legolas is part of another side plot introduced during this
film.
|
Bard the Boatman provides a very compelling voice of reason along the way against the quest for the Lonely Mountain, but he'll be even more important in the next film. |
Another big issue, as mentioned, is the rise of this new
threat. It was hinted at in the first
movie, with the "Necromancer" subplot, but this time it is delved
into in more detail, and it provides one of the major plot twists of the film
that ties into the original movies.
While the Necromancer was in the original film, it was only mentioned as
the reason for Gandalf's departure, so the detail were not in the original
book. This also ties into the Pale Orc
subplot, helping bring these characters and story elements together.
|
Stephen Fry adds a great deal of comedy in his role as the Master of Laketown |
Now to the main plot.
It tries to seamless meld the original story with the additions, but
obviously if you have read the book, there's no overlooking what isn't supposed
to be there, but that doesn't mean it's bad; on the contrary, it's
very well-done, and if you haven't read the book, you really wouldn't be able
to tell the difference, anyways.
However, some of it does feel like a desperate attempt to draw out the
story, since they are making another film out of it. And that does make for some disappointment as
somebody who wants to simply see a movie adaptation of the book itself, which
should have only taken up one or two films.
|
Nice to see some Tolkien vets return to do these films. A cameo would have felt more appropriate, but Legolas is here to kick some orcish, and possibly dwarfish, ass. |
As for the characters, Bilbo and Thorin are both very well
portrayed, just like the previous film, and Gandalf is Gandalf, so there should
really be no doubts there. The new central
characters, King Thranduil of the wood elves, Tauriel (another add-on), and
Smaug himself. Thranduil provides an
interesting conflict with Thorin, who still recalls when Thranduil betrayed the
dwarves in their time of need. Tauriel
has a little romance throughout the film with Kili, which adds some humor
initially, but evolves into something more serious. This pits Kili against Legolas, who has his
own sights set on Tauriel, so there is some additional conflict there. Bard, who is important in the 3rd act of the
story, is introduced, and has a very level-headed presence in the film, just
like in the book. He fears the dwarves'
quest will anger Smaug, which could lead to dire consequences for Laketown,
despite everyone believing the dwarves will bring riches to share with the
town, saving it from poverty.
|
Tauriel is an add-on to the story, but she has a lot to bring forward. |
Now for Smaug. Anyone who has read the book knows just how
big (pun intended) this character is in the climax of the film, and the short
but sweet back-and-forth with Bilbo provides some of the greatest tension
between this halfling and the towering monster that destroyed a kingdom. Smaug (along with "The
Necromancer") is voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch, who played Khan in the
latest Star Trek film. His voice acting is incredible, making Smaug
into a dark, yet intelligent and charismatic character on-screen. The detail that went into animating this
dragon shows, and his every movement looks as life-like as a towering mythical
beast can look.
|
Nice dragon...... NIIIIIICE dragon. |
The only major detractor from the film is the ending, which
I saw coming. As I stated before, the
book didn't really fit into a trilogy of films, and one of those reasons is
there is no good place in the source material to break the story up at this
point. From the time that the group
reaches the Lonely Mountain, it becomes a straight dash to the finish, so no
matter how it ended, it didn't provide any sense of closure; and while
cliffhangers aren't bad, this wasn't so much of a cliffhanger as it was a
mandatory cut-off, which hurts the film as a whole.
|
It's for visuals like this that we want to see epics like The Hobbit and Lord of the Rings turned into film, and this film brilliantly executes the beauty and scale of the world, along with the depth and dimension of the story and characters. |
Overall, this is a great film. Despite the awkward timing of the ending,
which honestly couldn't have been avoided (unless the greedy studio could just
leave it be and only do one or two films).
The characters from the book are all there, and well-adapted. The story-crashers, as I like to call all the
additional characters, are very well implemented into the film, but there is no
mistaking one when you have read the book.
The story is more of what you expect from the first film, and the CGI
looks a lot better this time around, for the most part. Smaug is an amazing presence on screen,
feeling just as imposing as a dragon should.
Should you see this film? Hell yes.
Is it beyond fault? obviously, no.
But still, this is a very enjoyable film, and I can't wait for the final
installment in the trilogy.
The Good:
-More of The Hobbit,
'nuff said.
-"Smaug the Terrible?" More like "Smaug the
Awesome." Benedict Cumberbatch
plays the role well, giving that same charismatic, yet sinister feeling that
you saw in Into Darkness.
-Some nice cameos to the original Lord of the Rings films for long-time fans of Tolkien's work or
Jackson's films.
-New characters from the book are all very well portrayed,
and give some dimension to the story by challenging the nobility of the quest,
warning of the consequences and dangers outside of just the protagonists.
The Bad:
-Ending is a little awkward and sudden, with some filler bits along the way, which was
unavoidable unless you cut down on the number of films, which is what should
have been done in the first place.
Scully Rating: 9.7 out of 10